Law Office of
Michael Mitchell
Aggressive Dui Defense
5588 N. Palm Avenue Suite A-2, Fresno, CA 93704
Tel 559-435-5059 Fax 559-435-5016
NEWSLETTER
Criminal Law September 7, 2010
 
Criminal Law
 

Fraud in Bankruptcy: Foreclosure Scams

Due to an increased acceptance of bankruptcy and a changing economic climate, there has been almost a 500% increase in ...(more)

 

Severing the Parental Rights of Inmates and the Constitutionality of Restricting Visitation

According to the Child Welfare League of America, an estimated 200,000 children have a mother in prison, and at least ...(more)

 

The Procedural Default Rule Concerning Federal Habeas Corpus Claims

Generally, state prisoners and other individuals in "custody" are permitted to raise questions concerning the constitutionality of their confinement by ...(more)

 

When a Miranda Warning is Required

The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that no persons shall be compelled to be a witness against himself..." ...(more)

 

Criminal Law in the News

Teen's 84-year sentence overturned by court

Did wife falsely confess to killing her husband?

Calif. bill would give child molesters life terms

Federal contractor charged with leaking secrets

Pennsylvania Indicts Agency Execs, Spouses in $7.5M Pyramid Scheme

Questions Over Constitutionality of New Arizona Law


A new immigration bill signed by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer on April 23, 2010 will be challenged in court, according to the Los Angeles Times.  The law, which is set to be implemented this summer, makes it a state crime to be present illegally in Arizona.  It requires local police to ask for proof of lawful immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion that someone is present in the state in violation of federal immigration law.  The law would make the failure to carry immigration documents a crime and give the police broad power to detain anyone suspected of being in the country illegally.  It also bars day laborers from soliciting work in public places in Arizona.
 
Constitutionality Questioned
Controversy over the new law has blown up across the United States as well as in Mexico, where the government has been very vocal about its opposition to Arizona's new policies.  Immigrant advocacy groups and constitutional law attorneys, including the ACLU and MALDEF, are preparing to file lawsuits aimed at stopping the law from taking effect.  One of the main challenges proposed is the argument that only the federal government has the power to enforce its immigration laws.  This is the same argument that effectively stopped many aspects of California's Proposition 187 from taking effect fifteen years ago.  Although the lawyer who drafted the Arizona bill attempted to avoid violating this core tenet of constitutional law, many legal commentators and analysts feel that the bill is vulnerable to a challenge on this basis. 
 
Attorneys and Law Enforcement Raise Concerns
Attorneys will likely also bring additional legal arguments against the implementation of the new bill, which is believed by many to be an overzealous and xenophobic effort that will probably result in racial profiling, improper detentions of innocent people, and wasted government money.  Additionally, law enforcement officers have raised concerns that the new law will subvert public safety efforts.  Even before any lawsuits are filed, protests and boycotts of all kinds are being considered, organized, and executed around the country.
 
Seek Advice from an Attorney if You Have Been Arrested
If you have been arrested, seek advice from a criminal defense attorney immediately to understand your options and protect your rights.

© 2010 NextClient.com, Inc.  All rights reserved.